Print version of this document ![]()
![]() |
Adar 5762
There was no sicha delivered in the Yeshiva this week, the following is a translation of the sicha from Parshat Ki Tisah 5751.
Following the detailed instructions on how to construct the
Mishkan, the Torah commands "you must observe My Sabbaths" [1] (Shmot
31:13). Chazal offer many interpretations for this pasuk, but Rashi
explains on a "pshat" level that construction of the Mishkan must not be
at the expense of Shabbat observance. This is as opposed to the offering
of the Korbanot which involve acts otherwise forbidden on Shabbat.
One possible explanation as to why Shabbat may not be violated for
construction of the Beit Hamikdash is that the function of the Mikdash is
to increase the glory of Heaven in this world. Serving Hashem in a
Sanctuary that is respectable and beautiful, one in which the people
themselves have an opportunity to contribute to its beauty, increases the
level of yirat Shamayim. Nevertheless, given that the Mikdash is built by
human beings, it is only natural for an observer to be mainly impressed by
man's ability to build such an edifice - the sense of "there is none
beside Him" [2] (Devarim 4:35) is lacking, just as today sometimes a
person's main impression of the Kotel is of the way it was constructed.
Shabbat, on the other hand, is testimony to the fact that "there
is none beside Him" - man has no share in the Shabbat. The Shabbat is
"raza d'Echad" "the mystery of Oneness" - entirely belonging to Hashem.
It is for this reason that the bracha for the sanctification of the
Shabbat is not "mekadesh Yisrael vehaShabbat" "Who sanctifies Israel and
the Shabbat" - (as we say on the Chagim "Mekadesh Yisrael vehazmanim").
Here the Jewish nation is not mentioned because while the Jewish people
may determine the precise time for Yom Tov, the time of Shabbat stems from
the time of Creation - it is "established in perpetuity from the six days
of Creation" [3] (Pesachim 117b). Therefore, regarding the Chagim the
Rambam tells us that should there, G-d forbid, arise a situation in which
no Jewish people will the reside in the Land of Israel, the Yom Tovim will
become null and void. We are promised, however, that this scenario will
never occur, the source probably rooted in the words of the Megillah: "and
these days of Purim should never cease among the Jews, nor shall their
remembrance perish from their descendants" [4] (Esther 9:28) - the twelfth
month of Adar (and therefore the other months) will always exist.
On Shabbat we feel Hashem's presence more strongly than during the
rest of the week, on weekdays we feel, so to speak, as if we are partners
in the running of the world, making Hashem's honor and glory hidden as
against Shabbat when it is more revealed. Yom Tovim (in which there are
less prohibitions than on Shabbat) there is a revelation of the glory of
Heaven but on a lesser level. There are those who rule that even on Yom
Kippur, there is no prohibition against carrying between a private and
public domain (although the halacha is not in accordance with this view)
and there is a discussion whether we may utilize work done by animals.
Even if the prohibitions of Shabbat apply on Yom Kippur, they are not
punishable by stoning as they are on Shabbat. Yom Kippur is not "a
memorial for the six days of Creation" [5] the way the Shabbat is.
The construction of the Beit Hamikdash cannot be carried out on
Shabbat or even on Yom Tov - for on these days, man is not involved in the
creative activities of the world. I asked one of the Gedolim once whether
construction of the Beit Hamikdash may be carried out on Chol Hamoed, to
which his response was that it depends on how one rules regarding the
question of whether we don Tefillin on Chol Hamoed. The custom in
Yerushalayim is not to lay Tefillin, it would therefore stand to reason
that we may not construct the Beit Hamikdash on Chol Hamoed - it is a day
in which man is less involved in the labor and running of the world.
Given that the construction of the Mikdash is the work of man, the Shabbat
- the day in which man is not involved, may not be desecrated for its
construction. The cessation of building of this edifice on the Shabbat
results in a greater revelation of the glory of Heaven.
Perhaps this is where the Jewish people erred in the chet haegel -
they felt that they could decide for themselves where and in what form the
Divine Presence should be housed. The Kuzari and the Ramban explain that
the people were in search of a physical housing for the Shchina to replace
Moshe Rabenu whom they had mistakenly thought had died. Their decision,
of course, was improper, for only Hashem can decide where to house His
Shchina. Man may carry out the CONSTRUCTION of the Mishkan, but not the
PLANNING. The sin of the chet haegel was that the people thought they
could be involved in the planning stages as well. When David HaMelech
handed over the plans for the construction of the Mikdash to Shlomo, he
told him: "everything is in writing, by the hand of Hashem, which He gave
me understanding to know" [6] (Divrei Hayamim I 28:19). The shape and
form of Hashem's Eternal Home was as it was dictated to him by Shmuel
Hanavi. We find several sources in Chazal for prohibiting any part of the
Beit Hamikdash to be constructed based on the decisions of man. The chet
haegel was viewed so severely because the Mikdash is a place of total
yirat Shamayim, in the planning of which man plays no role - the planning
is Hashem's alone. The Jewish people sinned by deciding for themselves to
construct the Golden Calf.
Chazal compare the sin of the spies and the "mekoshesh eitzim"
(the person who gathered wood on Shabbat - see Bamidbar 15:32-36), with
that of Adam HaRishon partaking from the Tree of Knowledge. One opinion
states that the trees gathered by the "mekoshesh eitzim" were the Tree of
Knowledge and the Tree of Life. This, of course, is in the hidden realms
of the Torah and on a simple "pshat" level they were ordinary trees, yet
we can perhaps understand Chazal's words regarding the similarity of these
sins based our own intellectual perception. Hashem commanded the Jewish
people to enter the Land of Israel, a Land whose uniqueness is expressed
as "a land that Hashem, your G-d, seeks out; the eyes of Hashem, your G-d,
are always upon it, from the beginning of the year to year's end" [7]
(Devarim 10:12). What does this mean? Is Hashem not found everywhere?
The Ramban explains that DIVINE Providence in Eretz Yisrael is immediately
noticeable. When the Kuttim worshipped Avoda Zara in Eretz Yisrael they
were punished immediately, which was not the case while in Chutz la'Aretz.
In Chutz la'Aretz, Hashem allows events to be run more in concert with the
laws of nature - his Hand is hidden from us. The miracle of Purim occurred
in Chutz la'Aretz - and Chazal regard the pasuk: "But I will surely have
concealed My face on that day" [8] (Devarim 31:18) as referring to the
miracle of Purim. Only when we read the entire Megilla do we ponder the
unlikelihood of this sequence of events being a mere coincidence - and the
A-lmighty's presence becomes obvious. The miracle must be sought from the
depths of His concealment. With the exception of Egypt, Chutz la'Aretz is
generally not a place in which open miracles occur.
One of the reasons why Hallel is not recited on Purim is "we do
not recite Hallel for a miracle that occurred outside the Land of Israel"
[9] (Megilla 14a). Eretz Yisrael is designated as a place of Divine
revelation and therefore miracles are more common. The proof for this is
that in the Beit Hamikdash ten miracles occurred daily - the greater the
sanctity of the place, the more we see and feel Hashem's direct
intervention - without being limited by any laws of nature.
Moshe Rabenu told the spies, that if in the desert (which was in
Chutz la'Aretz) they merited conquering the enemy due to the miracles
Hashem performed for them, how much stronger would Divine Providence be
once they entered the Land of Israel. "Yet in this matter you do not
believe in Hashem, your G-d" [10] (Devarim 1:32) - they preferred Hashem's
hidden Providence to His more revealed presence in Eretz Yisrael. This
was precisely the advice given Adam HaRishon by the serpent - is it not
better to serve Hashem when His Presence is hidden. The serpent argued
that it is easy to serve Hashem without the test of having to choose
between good and evil, when it is clear what path to choose, real devotion
entails making a choice. We can only speak this way of Adam HaRishon
based on our own limited ability to understand and based on what Chazal
have told us. Chazal tell us, in fact, that Adam HaRishon's wisdom was
greater than that of the administering angels. Yet, Adam HaRishon
preferred to remain serving Hashem on a lower level.
The same mistake the spies made regarding SPACE - preferring to
serve Hashem in a place of lower sanctity, the "mekoshesh" made regarding
TIME. He believed in Hashem and that He runs the world, but he wanted to
feel Hashem's presence even while involved in active labor. He preferred
serving Hashem's hidden weekday presence over the more revealed and open
Shabbat presence. The "mekoshesh", from this perspective, preferred to
eat from the Tree of Knowledge rather than from the Tree of Life - which
symbolizes a Life that is entirely Shabbat.
As the Mikdash and the Shabbat serve to awaken us, we must
constantly search for ways in which to increase the glory of heaven rather
than our own honor. It is taught that the word "Bereishit" an anagram of
"yerei Shabbat" (awe of Shabbat). Shabbat and the Mikdash of which it is
written "My Sanctuary shall you revere" [11] (Vayikra 26:2), serve as
models for increasing our awe of G-d and negating ourselves before Him.
Haman, sought the opposite - the only honor he cared for was his own. It
was not enough that the whole world was bowing down to him, he wished to
be treated as a god. He became infuriated when even one person refused to
bow to him: "However it seemed contemptible to him to send his hand
against Mordechai alone" [12] (Esther 3:6) and he wanted to destroy the
entire Jewish nation without leaving even a trace. Haman wished to rise
high and "King Achashverosh promoted Haman" [13] (Esther 3:1) - as Chazal
tell us, he "promoted" him fifty amot high. So " May all Your enemies be
destroyed O Hashem" [14] (Shoftim 5:31), speedily in our day. Amen.
Sanctification of Time and Place
APPENDIX (TRANSLITERATIONS OF SOURCES)
[1] "ach et Shabtotai tishmoru"
[2] "ein od milvado"
[3] "dekvia vekayma"
[4] "vimei haPurim haele lo yaavru mitoch haYehudim, vezichram lo yasuf
mizaram"
[5] "zecher lemaase Bereishit"
[6] "hakol bichtav miyad Hashem alai hiskil"
[7] "eretz asher Hashem Elokecha doresh ota tamid einei Hashem Elokecha
ba mereishit hashana ve-ad acharit shana"
[8] "ve-Anochi haster astir panai bayom hahu"
[9] "ein omrim Hallel al nes shebechutza laaretz"
[10] "uvadavar hazeh einchem maaminim baHashem Elokeichem"
[11] "umikdashi tirau"
[12] "vayivez be-einav lishloach yad beMordechai levado"
[13] "gidal hamelech Achashverosh et Haman"
[14] "ken yovdu kol oyvecha Hashem"
This is the translation of the sicha delivered by HaGaon
HaRav Avigdor Nebenzahl every Sunday night in the Beit Midrash of
Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh. We try our best to accurately present to you the Rav's
words. The transition from spoken to written word and subsequent
translation do not always allow for a literal word for word translation.
We would like to thank HaRav Nebenzahl for allowing us to send you this
sicha without his first reviewing the translation. Although it does
expedite matters in getting this sicha out to you, it does mean that if
there is anything in the sicha that may not be understood, the fault is
with us and not with HaRav Nebenzahl.
(Translation by
Nehemia Klein - ndk@yna.edu)
(C) 5769/2009 by Yeshivat Netiv Aryeh
All rights reserved. The information published here is protected under international copyright law. You are welcome to copy or print (intact) copies of this information for personal use only. You may also send (intact) copies to other people - whom you personally know - without prior permission. All other forms of reproduction or republishing are prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright owner(s). Such permission is usually given freely, but must be obtained.